[2026:RJ-JP:14626] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6460/2025 Dayaram S/o Shri Laxman Meena, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Meena Ki Dhani, Village Sainthal, District Dausa (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Director General of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Superintendent of Police, Dausa, District Dausa (Raj.) 4. Station House Officer, Police Station Sainthal, District Dausa (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 08/04/2026 No one is present on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner-complainant has preferred this criminal miscellaneous petition seeking fair investigation. A complaint has been filed by the complainant before the concerned Court which was forwarded under Section 175(3) of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita ("BNSS") to the concerned police station whereupon the present FIR came to be registered. Heard learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. & Ors., AIR 2008 SC Page 907 has held that the Magistrate has very wide powers to direct registration of an FIR [2026:RJ-JP:14626] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6460/2025] and to ensure a proper investigation and for this purpose, he can monitor the investigation to ensure that the investigation is done properly. The High Court should discourage the practice of filing a writ petition or petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C./528 of BNSS simply because a person has a grievance that after registration of FIR, proper investigation has not been done by the police. In view of above, this Court is not inclined to entertain the criminal miscellaneous petition. The same is accordingly dismissed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to approach the concerned Magistrate for redressing his grievance. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J YOGESH KUMAR /20