[2026:RJ-JP:23512] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8457/2026 Sonu S/o Munshi, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Khanna Colony, Police Thana Newmandi Hindon City, District Karauli. (At Present Confined At Sub Jail Hindon City). ----Accused-Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Abdul Rahim Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI (V.J.) Order 23/06/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed by the accused – applicant by invoking the provisions of Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, the requisite details of which are as under:- Sr. No. Particulars 1. FIR No. and Date 0217/2026 dated 19.05.2026 2. Concerned Police Station New Mandi Hindaun, District Karauli 3. Offences as alleged in FIR Under Sections 112(2) of BNS, 2023, and 13 of Rajasthan Public Gambling Ordinance, 1949 4. Date of Arrest 19.05.2026 2. Learned counsel for the accused–applicant submits that the accused - applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case and prima facie, no offence(s) as alleged in the above mentioned FIR is made out against him. [2026:RJ-JP:23512] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8457/2026] 3. Learned counsel for the accused - applicant submits that the offence alleged in the abovementioned FIR is with respect to the involvement of the accused-applicant in gambling activities. 4. Learned counsel further submits that all the alleged offences against the accused-applicant are triable by Magistrate. Learned counsel further submits that the accused – applicant is in custody since 19.05.2026 and has no criminal antecedents. Hence, learned counsel prays that the accused-applicant be granted bail. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the averments made by learned counsel for the accused - applicants, however, he could not dispute the fact that all the alleged offences involved in the present matter are triable by Magistrate. 6. Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant and the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 7. Having regard to the submissions advanced, and the facts that all the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; there are no criminal antecedents of the accused-applicant; no useful purpose would be served by keeping the accused - applicant in custody, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused - applicant on bail. 8. Consequently, the present bail application is allowed and the accused–applicant Sonu S/o Munshi arrested in connection with the above mentioned FIR be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case upon furnishing of personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of the same amount each, to the [2026:RJ-JP:23512] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8457/2026] satisfaction of the learned trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the learned trial Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial. 9. 9. Additionally, the accused – applicant will also remain bound by the following conditions:- (i) The accused – applicant shall not leave the country without seeking prior permission of the learned trial Court; (ii) The accused – applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence(s) of which he stands accused of and in the event, the accused – applicant is found to be involved in any other similar case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein; (iii) The accused – applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer/investigating authority; and (iv) The accused – applicant shall not tamper with any evidence nor would influence any witnesses in the case. (ANUROOP SINGHI (V.J.)),J 100/DIPESH CHAYAL