HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 56210 of 2009 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. Heard Sri Kartikeya Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Sri Rahul Sripat, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Ravi Anand Agarwal, learned counsel for the private respondents and learned Standing Counsel for the State- Respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners informs the Court that due to subsequent developments, the present writ petition has now become infructuous and the same be dismissed as having become infructuous, which has not been opposed by learned counsel for the private respondents as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State-Respondent. 3. Prayer is allowed. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. September 24, 2026 Gaurav Kuls Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ishir Sripat, Rahul Sripat Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anil Tiwari, C.S.C., G.S. Singh, Madan Mohan, Mahesh Narain Singh, Ravi Anand Agarwal (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Sarfaraz Alam And Others .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad