Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8985 (RAJ)

MAHENDRA S/O SH. HARIPRASAD v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2860/2026 · 2026-06-15

Bipin Gupta V J

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:23185] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2860/2026 Mahendra S/o Sh. Hariprasad, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Kaushali, Police Station Soorwal, Distt. Sawaimadhopur. (Presently Confined In District Jail, Sawaimadhopur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Koslesh Kumar Bairwa For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.) Judgment / Order 15/06/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 05.02.2026, passed by the learned Session Judge, Sawai Madhopur, in Bail Application No. 99/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No. 30/2026, registered at Police Station-Surwal, District-Sawai Madhopur for the offences under Section 318(4), 316(2), 319(2), 338 and 340(2), 111(2)(B), 336(3) of BNS,2023 and Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only two complaint has been registered against the petitioner on the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal and that the amount involved is Rs. 2,93,000/-. He further submits that the conclusion of trial is likely to take sufficient long time. He also submits that [2026:RJ-JP:23185] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2860/2026] the offences are triable by a Magistrate and that the challan has already been filed. Therefore, he prays that the petitioner be enlarged on bail, as the accused has been in custody since 02.02.2026. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 5. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced as well as the fact that the offences are triable by Magistrate and the amount involved is Rs.2,93,000/- only, and the charge-sheet having been filed, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted. 6. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the petitioner namely-Mahendra S/o Sh. Hariprasad arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 30/2026, registered at Police Station Surwal, District-Sawai Madhopur for, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rupees One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs.50,000/ (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not leave the country without the prior permission of the Court; [2026:RJ-JP:23185] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2860/2026] (ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected to have committed; (iii) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat, or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing those facts to the Court or to any police officer, nor shall he tamper with the evidence; and (iv) In the event the petitioner is found to be involved in any other cyber fraud case in future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned Trial Court seeking cancellation of the bail granted herein. (BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.)),J 5/JUBIN/788