State of H.P. & Ors. Vs. Seema & Ors. CMPs No. 8728 & 11225/2026 in RFA No. 476/2015 19.05.2026 Present: Ms. Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the non-applicants/appellants. Name of respondent No. 1 stands deleted. Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for applicant/respondent No. 2. Mr. J.R. Poswal, Advocate, for respondent applicant/No. 3. CMP No. 8728/2026 The present application under Section 151 of CPC has been filed on behalf of applicant/respondent No. 3, Saraswati, for release of the award amount, alongwith up-to-date interest, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant. No reply to the application has been filed despite opportunity granted in this respect. However, learned Deputy Advocate General for the non- applicants/appellants states that till date, no SLP has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant, coupled with the fact that till date, no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court and the same has attained finality, the same ….2…. is allowed and the award amount lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, alongwith up-to-date interest, is ordered to be released in favour of applicant/respondent No. 3, Saraswati, as per her share, after proper verification and identification, by remitting the same to her bank account, details whereof have been mentioned in para-3 of the application. The application stands disposed of. CMP No. 11225/2026 The present application under Section 151 of CPC has been filed on behalf of applicant/respondent No. 2, Rajesh Kumar, for release of the award amount, alongwith up-to-date interest, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant. No reply to the application has been filed despite opportunity granted in this respect. However, learned Deputy Advocate General for the non- applicants/appellants states that till date, no SLP has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit ….3…. of the applicant, coupled with the fact that till date, no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court and the same has attained finality, the same is allowed and the award amount lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, alongwith up-to-date interest, is ordered to be released in favour of applicant/respondent No. 2, Rajesh Kumar, as per his share, after proper verification and identification, by remitting the same to his bank account, details whereof have been mentioned vide Annexure P-2. The application stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 19th May, 2026 (raman)