Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010113862026 2026:GAU-AS:9259 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1235/2026 NAZIR UDDIN LASKAR S/O LATE KUTUB UDDIN LASKAR, R/O VILL- KASHIPUR, P.O AND P.S BORKHOLA, IN THE DISTRICT OF CACHAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR UNUSH KHAN, G MUSHAHARY,SHAHIR KHAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 25-06-2026 Heard learned counsel Mr. U. Khan for the petitioner Nazir Uddin Laskar, who has filed this application under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with prayer for pre-arrest bail as he is apprehending arrest in connection with Borkhola Police Station Case No. 9/2026 under Sections Page No.# 2/3 296/75(2)/64(1)/351(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 2. Heard Mr. K. Baishya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent State. 3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is a well decorated exserviceman and he has also received commendation certificate. The allegation against the petitioner is absolutely false. It is submitted that both the parties are embroiled in a land dispute and a false case has been brought up against the petitioner. 4. Per contra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that the submission of the petitioner that the FIR was registered after 12 (Twelve) days, can be safely brushed aside. As per the BNSS, as soon as an information is received, an enquiry has to be held in certain cases. The medico-legal report clearly reveals that the victim was forwarded for medical examination on 29.01.2026 and the incident occurred on 27.01.2026. There is also a note from the SSP as the victim had approached the SSP for registration of a case. This may have caused the delay. 5. I have considered the submissions at the bar with circumspection. I have also scrutinized the Case Diary. As submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, there are indeed incriminating materials in the Case Diary. 6. Considering the gravity of the offence alleged, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail at this stage. It appears that investigation may be adversely affected at this stage if the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail. Thereby, petitioner’s prayer for anticipatory bail stands rejected at this stage. Page No.# 3/3 7. In terms of the above observation, this Anticipatory Bail application stands disposed of. 8. Send back the Case Diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant