Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8984 (AP)

CHIGURUPATI SAI KAMAL v. KOMMINENI VINAYAKA RAO AND ANOTEHRS

CRLA/14/2014 · 2026-09-01

Alapati Giridhar

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010569712014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3605] WEDNESDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 14 of 2014 Between: 1. CHIGURUPATI SAI KAMAL, S/O SATYANARAYANA R/O MUTYALAREDDY NAGAR, 2ND LINE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.. ...APELLANT AND 1. KOMMINENI VINAYAKA RAO AND ANOTEHRS, S/O SEETHAIAH, C/O LVR & SONS CLUB, KORITIPADU MAIN ROAD, (RING ROAD) GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF A.P, HYDERABAD. ...RESPODENT(S): Appeal under Section 372/374(2)/378(4) of Cr.P.C praying that the High Court may be pleased to allow the Crl.A by setting aside the order dt. 17-6- 2013 acquitting the accused in Cc.NO.76/2011 on the file of the V Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur in the interest of justice and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(CRLAMP 1817 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to representation the delay of 4 days in above Appeal and pass such other and further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 2 OF 2013(CRLAMP 2083 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to file the appeal under sec 378(4) of Cr.P.C. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(CRLAMP 28 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the documents filed by me in the Crl.Miscellaneous petition as additional evidence and pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1. A CHANDRAIH NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following Judgment: Aggrieved by the Judgment, dated 17.06.2013 in C.C.No.76 of 2011 passed by learned V Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur in acquitting the Accused under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the present Appeal has been preferred by the Appellant/ Complainant. 2. Mr. A. Chandraiah Naidu, learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, submits that the Accused is passed away. 3. Recording the above submission, the Criminal Appeal is dismissed as abated. The miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR Dated 02.09.2026 KK THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 14 of 2014 Dated 02.09.2026 KK