Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8981 (UTT)

JEEWAN RAM ARYA v. MANAGING DIRECTOR

WPSS/1981/2026 · 2026-07-28

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010130752026 2026:UHC:6498 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/1981/2026 Jeewan Ram Arya --Petitioner Versus Managing Director --Respondent Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Tarun Prakash Singh Takuli, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Shobhit Joshi, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Ashish Joshi, Advocate for the respondents. 3. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:- “i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned order no. 1938 KR/Aath/Gratuity/Sri Jeewan Ram Arya /2026 dated 02- 01-2026 passed by the respondent no. 2, by which an amount of Rs. 2,52,888/- (Rupees Two Lakhs, Fifty Two Thousand, Eight Hundred Eighty Eight only) has been deducted from the Gratuity stating therein that the excess ACP/pay has been paid to the petitioner by the department during the service tenure of the petitioner, which creates great hardship, irreparable loss and injury to the petitioner and the same cannot be compensated by any means. {annexure no. 1 (Page No. 15,16,17) to the writ petition). ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to release the deducted amount i.e. Rs. 2,52,888/- (Rupees Two Lakhs, Fifty Two Thousand, Eight Hundred Eighty Eight only) in favour of the petitioner as early as possible preferably within a period of three months, else the petitioner shall suffer irreparable loss and injury and the same cannot be compensated by any means.” UKHC010130752026 2026:UHC:6498 4. Learned counsel for the parties are unanimous on the point that the issue involved here is decided by Division Bench in Special Appeal No. 245 of 2022. 5. In view of the concession made by learned counsel appearing for the Uttarakhand Transport Corporation, the writ petition is decided in terms of judgment rendered in Special Appeal No. 245 of 2022. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 28.07.2026 Navin NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a131bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE 5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2026.07.28 16:41:41 +05'30'