[2026:RJ-JP:23814] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7335/2026 URN: CRLMB / 13353U / 2026 Devisahay Son Of Shivcharan, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Mannoj Tehsil Todabhim District Karauli Rjasthan (At Present In Sub Jail Hindaun City) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8603/2026 URN: CRLMB / 15726U / 2026 Dinesh Kumar Meena S/o Shri Hari Mohan, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Jinsi Ka Pura, Police Station Todabheem, District Karauli (Raj.) (At Present He Is Confined in Sub Jail, Hindaun). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijayant Nirwan Mr. Asad Ul Haq Nooree Mr. Krishan Kumar Mahar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 30/06/2026 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of the accused-petitioners. The accused- petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 118/2026 registered at Police Station Todabhim, District Karauli for offence under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of NDPS Act, 1985. [2026:RJ-JP:23814] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7335/2026] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He further submits that contraband article recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners is below commercial quantity. There are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused- petitioners, accused-petitioners are behind the bars since 10.04.2026, charge-sheet have already been filed and further trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners and the fact that petitioners are in custody since 10.04.2026 and further trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, without commenting on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners Devisahay Son Of Shivcharan and Dinesh Kumar Meena S/o Shri Hari Mohan, arrested in connection with FIR No. 118/2026 registered at Police Station Todabhim, District Karauli shall be enlarged on bail provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The learned trial Judge shall also verify the [2026:RJ-JP:23814] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7335/2026] address and the contact details of the surety through concerned SHO before releasing the accused-petitioners on bail. 7. The accused-petitioners are also directed to mark their presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioners and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioners on the same day to the concerned Trial Court without any delay. 8. The accused-petitioners are also directed to submit his present address along with the mobile number to the concerned SHO within a period of 7 days from their release and the concerned SHO shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the petitioners changes their address or mobile number, they shall submit the same before the concerned SHO so also before the concerned learned Trial Court. In case of any breach to the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned SHO for its strict compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J 10-11/PARSHANT