ARUN KUMAR YADAV AND ANOTHER v. OM PRAKASH SINGH AND ANOTHER
A227/11922/2026 · 2026-09-23
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8979 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8979 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11922 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. This is a petition on behalf of third party. An impleadment application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC has been filed in Suit No.325 of 2020. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the said application.
2. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, or calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to the private respondents, at this stage, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, with a direction upon Civil Judge (Junior Division), Chandauli to decide the impleadment application filed under Order I Rule 10 CPC in Suit No.325 of 2020, in accordance with law, after hearing all the affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
3. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of.
4. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. September 24, 2026 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jitendra Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Pushpendra Kumar Yadav, Shreya Yadav (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Arun Kumar Yadav And Another .....Petitioner(s) Om Prakash Singh And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad