(1 of 5) [CRLMB-7475/2026] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7475/2026 Kiran S/o Battilal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Batoda, Police Station Batoda, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9104/2026 Arvind Kumar S/o Chiranjilal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Batoda, Ps Batoda, District Sawai Madhopur, Raj. (At Present Confined In Dist Jail Sawai Madhopur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sharma Mr. Utkarsh Goyal Mr. Tarun Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta Mr. Naresh Gupta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.) Order 15/06/2026 In S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7475/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 20.04.2026, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Gangapur City, Sawai (2 of 5) [CRLMB-7475/2026] Madhopur, in Bail Application No.164/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.42/2026, Police Station-Batoda, District-Sawai Madhopur for the offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 61(2)(a) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no criminal antecedent and the total amount involved is approximately Rs.2,87,000/-. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the challan in the case has already been filed. Moreover, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and even the offences are triable by the Magistrate. Therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail as the accused is in custody since 02.04.2026. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted. 7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely Kiran S/o Battilal arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.42/2026, Police Station Batoda, District Sawai Madhopur, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two (3 of 5) [CRLMB-7475/2026] sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; (iii) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and (iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other cyber fraud case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein. In S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9104/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 02.06.2026, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Gangapur City, Sawai Madhopur in Bail Application No.224/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.42/2026, Police Station-Batoda, District-Sawai Madhopur for the offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 61(2)(a) of BNS, (4 of 5) [CRLMB-7475/2026] 2023 and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no criminal antecedents and the total amount involved is approximately Rs.2,87,000 /-. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the challan in the case has already been filed. Moreover, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and even the offences are triable by the Magistrate, therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail as the accused is in custody since 14.05.2026. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted. 7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely Arvind Kumar S/o Chiranjilal arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.42/2026, Police Station-Batoda, District-Sawai Madhopur, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates (5 of 5) [CRLMB-7475/2026] of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; (iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and (iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other cyber fraud case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein. (BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.)),J ANMOL/61-62