Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8976 (JHR)

NANDLAL CHANDRAVANSHI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3284/2026 · 2026-04-20

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:11453 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3284 of 2026 1. Nandlal Chandravanshi, son of Ramesh Rawani @ Ramesh Chandravanshi 2. Shyamalawati Devi @ Samjhauti Devi @ Samloti Devi, W/o Nandlal Chandravanshi … … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Lal Chandrahas Nath Shahedoe, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Vijoy Kr. Sinha, APP --- 02/20.04.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in custody since 25.02.2026 in connection with Kharaundhi P.S. Case No.35/2011, corresponding to S.T. Case No.96 of 2026, registered under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, charge framed under Section 304B/498A of the Indian Penal Code, now pending in the court of learned District & Sessions Judge IInd, Garhwa. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the husband, who was the co-accused in this case, has already been acquitted, and the petitioners are the brother-in-law and sister-in-law of the victim respectively. 4. The case was registered under Section 304B / 498A of Indian Penal Code. 5. This Court finds that there is direct allegation against the petitioners in connection with case instituted way back in 2011. 2026:JHHC:11453 2 Acquittal of the husband of the victim has no bearing in this case, as the petitioners never participated in the trial of the husband. 6. Accordingly, the bail application is hereby rejected. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:20.04.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:21.04.2026