[2026:RJ-JP:23290] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6294/2026 Ramesh Chand Meena S/o Ramphool, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village Amarpur, Police Station Raini, District Alwar, Rajasthan. Presently Resident Of Behind Sethi Petrol Pump, Ajay Colony Mandawar, Police Station Mandawar, District Dausa. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arun Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bal Ram Vashisth Mr. NS Dhakad, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.) Judgment / Order 16/06/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 17.04.2026 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge No.5, Jaipur Metropolitan-I , in Bail Application No. 98/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No. 20/2025 registered at Police Station Malviya Nagar, Jaipur for the offences under Section 42, 406, 467, 468, 471 IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the dispute arises out of a breach of an agreement to sell. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to hand over the demand draft of ₹12,00,000/- received from the complainant under the agreement to sell. He further submitted [2026:RJ-JP:23290] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6294/2026] that the offences alleged are triable by a Magistrate and that the challan has already been filed. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that no amount was received by the petitioner in cash, whereas learned counsel for the complainant contends that a sum of ₹12,80,000/- was paid in cash. It is further submitted that the conclusion of the trial is likely to take a considerable period of time and the challan has already been filed. Accordingly, it is prayed that the petitioner be enlarged on bail, particularly in view of the fact that he has been in judicial custody since 12.04.2026. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application, but however the learned counsel for the complainant accepts that he may be handed over the demand draft and he may be given liberty to persuade his legal remedies available to him for recovery of balance amount. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the demand draft bearing No. 412609 is handed over to learned counsel appearing for the complainant, a photocopy whereof shall be retained on the record of this case. Having regard to the fact that the trial is likely to take considerable time and the offences are triable by a Magistrate and challan has already been filed. Therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail. It is, however, made clear that the complainant shall be at liberty to pursue any other legal remedy available under law for recovery of the balance amount, if any. [2026:RJ-JP:23290] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6294/2026] 7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the petitioner namely - Ramesh Chand Meena S/o Ramphool arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 20/2025 registered at Police Station Malviya Nagar, Jaipur, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rupees One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs.50,000/ (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; (iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence (BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.)),J 151/Jubin