Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8967 (RAJ)

MOHHAMAD SADDAM S/O SHRI MOHHAMAD JALALUDDIN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8905/2026 · 2026-06-30

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:23839] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8905/2026 URN: CRLMB / 16339U / 2026 Mohhamad Saddam S/o Shri Mohhamad Jalaluddin, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Sinauni, Post Barhara, Police Station Marona, District Supaul, Bihar. (The Accused Petitioner Is Presently Confined In Central Jail) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aman Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 30/06/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 393/2026 registered at Police Station Sanganer Sadar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offences under Sections 8/20 of NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated for the offence under Section 8/20 of NDPS Act. The recovered quantity of Ganja is 4kg 745 grams, which is below commercial quantity. The petitioner is behind the bars since 22.05.2026 and the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time. There are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner, [2026:RJ-JP:23839] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8905/2026] therefore, considering the above facts the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the quantity of Ganja recovered from the petitioner's possession is below commercial quantity and the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Mohhamad Saddam S/o Shri Mohhamad Jalaluddin in connection with FIR No. 393/2026 registered at Police Station Sanganer Sadar, District Jaipur City (South) shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Chetna/26