HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 40658 of 2026 Court No. - 76 HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J. 1. List revised. 2. Heard Sri Manvendra Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, and Sri V.D. Ojha, learned counsel for the State and perused the record. 3. This application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed by the applicant with the following prayers:- "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow this application and quash the entire proceeding of Session Case No.432 of 2026 (State of U.P. Vs. Janardan Yadav), arising out of case crime no. 31 of 2026, under sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) of B.N.S. and Sections 3(1)Da, 3(1)Dha and 3(2)Va of S.C./S.T. (P.A.) Act, Police Station Maniar, District Ballia, as well as charge sheet No. 037/2026 dated 09.04.2026 and cognizance/summoning order 20.05.2026 passed by Special Judge, S.C./S.T. Act, Ballia, pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge, (S.C./S.T.) Act, Ballia, otherwise the applicant shall suffer irreparable loss and injury. It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to stay the further proceeding of Session Case No.432 of 2026 (State of U.P. Vs. Janardan Yadav), arising out of case crime no. 31 of 2026, under sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) of B.N.S. and Sections 3(1)Da, 3(1)Dha and 3(2)Va of S.C./S.T. )P.A.) Act, Police Station Maniar, District Ballia, pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge, (S.C./S.T.) Act, Ballia, during pendency of present application before this Hon'ble Court, otherwise the applicant shall suffer irreparable loss and injury this Hon'ble Court." 4. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press the prayers made in the present petition on merits and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kundan Kumar Prasad, Manvendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Janardan Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) submits that the purpose of the applicant would suffice if an order is passed directing the trial court to decide the bail application of the applicant, as expeditiously as possible. 5. Learned counsel for the State has no objection of aforesaid arguments of learned counsel for the applicant. 6. In view of the above, the prayer as prayed for is dismissed as not pressed. 7. In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and looking to the limited prayer of learned counsel for the applicant, it is directed that if the accused-applicant surrenders before the trial court concerned on or before 07.10.2026 and applies for bail, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. 8. The present application is disposed of. 9. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. September 23, 2026 Naresh NA528 No. 40658 of 2026 2 (Samit Gopal,J.) Digitally signed by :- NARESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad