Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8964 (JHR)

HARPREET SINGH GILL ALIAS RAHUL GILL ALIAS HARPREET SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./706/2026 · 2026-02-26

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[ 2026:JHHC:5824] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 706 of 2026 Harpreet Singh Gill @ Rahul Gill @ Harpreet Singh, aged about 24 years, son of Surjeet Singh, resident of H.N. No. 238/2, Line No. 13, A Block, Near Shitla Mandir, Tuiladungri, P.O. & P.S.- Golmuri, Town- Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay , Adv. For the State : Mr. Vijoy Kr. Sinha , Addl. PP 02 / 26.02.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Golmuri P. S. case no. 95 of 2025 corresponding to S.T. Case No. 468/2025 instituted under Section 127(1), 127(2), 109, 308(4), 61 of B.N.S., 2023 & under section 27 of Arms Act. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in criminal conspiracy with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder Lochan Kumar. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and the said Lochan Kumar has not sustained any fire arm injury, rather Lochan Kumar is said to have sustained injury by falling down from the Scooty. It is then submitted that the co-accused Dhiren Tantu @ Mochi @ Dada is alleged to have opened the fire from his pistol. It is next submitted that the main allegation is against Dhiren Tantu @ Mochi @ Dada. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 19.07.2025, as mentioned in para 15 of this bail application. It is next submitted that no witness has been examined in this case and chargesheet has been submitted against the petitioner in this case. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co- operate with the trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail . Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Jamshedpur in connection with Golmuri P. S. case no. 95 of 2025 corresponding to S.T. Case No. 468/2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that his will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 26.02.2026 Smita/-