Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010112992026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1502/2026 SADIR ALI S/O LT NEWAJ ALI, R/O VILL MADHYA SIALMARI, PS NAGAON SADAR, DIST NAGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K SHARMA, MR. A AHAD Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 25.06.2026 Heard Mr. A. K. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. S. Lahkar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appears for the State of Assam. 2. This is an application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 whereby the petitioner, Sadir Ali has prayed for Page No.# 2/3 releasing him on bail after he was arrested in connection with Nagaon P.S. Case No.377/2026 registered under Sections 126 (2)/118(2)/3(5) of BNS, 2023. 3. The case projected by the petitioner is that on 23.05.2026 the complainant namely, Nargis Sultana, wife of-Abul Kalam, resident of-Madhupur, P.S and District-Nagaon, Assam lodged a written FIR at Nagaon Police Station stating that his younger brother, namely, akram Ahmed, had gone to Siyalmari Kutayoni Bazar on 23.05.2026 at about 9.00 a.m for marketing purpose. At that time, the FIR named accused persons, in a pre-planned conspiracy, along with other three unidentified persons with sharp weapons, allegedly assaulted his brother on head with a hammer, knife and finger-mounted weapon. And as a result of which, his brother sustained grievous injuries and is presently undergoing treatment at Nemchi hospital, Borbheti. 4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the informant side and the petitioner side are neighbours and all are known to each other but the present petitioner, Sadir Ali, who is the father of the main accused Washim Akram has not been named in the FIR and instead it is stated that some unknown persons were present with the main accused when the incident took place. 5. The case diary has not been received. 6. Upon perusal of the forwarding report including the ground of arrest, it is seen that only wrongful restrain has been mentioned therein and there is no indication of any grievous injuries having been caused 7. Having regard to the above, as well as the period of detention undergone by the petitioner, prayer for bail is allowed. Accordingly, it is directed that the Page No.# 3/3 petitioner is released on bail bond of ₹50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand) only with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Eleka Magistrate/Jurisdictional Court in connection with Nagaon P.S. Case No.377/2026. 8. Accordingly, the bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant