Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8959 (RAJ)

DHIRAJ KUMAR BUNKAR SON OF SHRI LAXMANRAM v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8330/2026 · 2026-06-30

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:24050] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous IInd Bail Application No. 8330/2026 URN: CRLMB / 15181U / 2026 Dhiraj Kumar Bunkar Son Of Shri Laxmanram, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Dhay Ka Mohalla, Bilwadi, Police Station Virat Nagar, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj). (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nav Ratan Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishiraj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) Order 30/06/2026 1. The present bail second application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Dhiraj Kumar Bunkar S/o Shri Laxmanram seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.109/2026 dated 20.03.2026 registered at Police Station Shahpura, District Jaipur (Rural), for the offence under Sections 8 and 20 of NDPS, 1985. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant-accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. He also submits that the [2026:RJ-JP:24050] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-8330/2026] applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with trial, which will take time. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that first bail application of present applicant was dismissed as withdrawn but now a charge-sheet has already been filed. Learned counsel has further submitted that co-accused Rohit Gujjar was granted bail by this Hon'ble Court on 01.05.2026. He also submitted that one more criminal case is registered against the applicant-accused where the applicant-accused is facing trial and he is on bail. He referred the charge-sheet and submitted that police has not complied mandatory provisions under the NDPS Act before effecting search and seizure and the non-compliance is sufficient to show that the applicant-accused was falsely implicated. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor and he submitted that the offence is serious in nature and role and involvement of applicant is established from the material on record. 5. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. On 20.03.2026 SHO Police Station Shahpura Riya Choudhary has intercepted a motorcycle and on search has recovered 2.033 Kg Ganja from possession of present applicant- accused. On basis of seizure memo FIR No. 109/2026 was registered at Police Station Shahpura, District Jaipur (Rural). After investigation police has filed a charge-sheet against present applicant-accused under Section 8/20 of NDPS Act [2026:RJ-JP:24050] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-8330/2026] and against Rohit Gujjar under Section 8/29 of NDPS Act. One more criminal case was registered against present applicant-accused. 7. This Court also finds that the applicant-accused has remained in custody for a considerable period of time and that the trial/proceedings are likely to take further time to conclude. Therefore, looking to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits thereof, this Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant-accused. 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Dhiraj Kumar Bunkar S/o Shri Laxmanram, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. [2026:RJ-JP:24050] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-8330/2026] 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J 11/Simran/-