2026:JHHC:3237-DB IN THE HIGHCOURT OFJHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (DB) No.104 of 2026 Amit Kumar Tiwari @ D.K., aged about 28 years, Son of Yadunandan Tiwari, R/o Karpardih, Palganj, Pirtand, P.O. and P.S.- Pirtand Giridih, Jharkhand. ... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand … Respondent --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA For the Appellant : Mrs. Suman Roy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, A.P.P. --- Order No.02/ Dated: 06th February, 2026 I.A. No. 16408 of 2025 Heard Mrs. Suman Roy, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and learned A.P.P. 2. This interlocutory application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning the delay of 31 days in filing the appeal. 3. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the instant application, the same is allowed and the delay of 31 days in filing the appeal is hereby condoned. 4. I.A. No. 16408 of 2025 stands disposed of. Cr. A.(DB) No. 104 of 2026 5. This appeal is directed against the order dated 02.08.2025 passed in M.C.A No. 1430 of 2025 arising out of Bishnugarh P.S. Case No. 39 of 2022 corresponding to S.T. Case No. 240 of 2025, by the learned Sessions Judge, Hazaribagh whereby and where under the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. 6. It has been alleged that on 01.03.2022 a bomb was thrown in the house of the informant which resulted in a huge explosion. Subsequently, on the next date, a WhatsApp call was received by the informant and the caller had demanded an amount of Rs. 5 Lakh and threatening was also given. 7. Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant that the FIR was instituted against unknown persons. It has further been submitted that appellant has been implicated on the confessional statement of co-accused Rameshwar Kumar @ Ramesh Karmali and 2 consequent to the same, the appellant has also confessed. Learned counsel submits that the appellant is in custody since 08.05.2025 8. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant and has submitted that appellant has got seven criminal antecedents. 9. Regard being had the manner of the implication of the appellant and the period of custody undergone by the appellant, we while setting aside the order dated 02.08.2025 passed in M.C.A No. 1430 of 2025 arising out of Bishnugarh P.S. Case No. 39 of 2022 corresponding to S.T. Case No. 240 of 2025, by the learned Sessions Judge, Hazaribagh direct that the appellant be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten Thousand) subject to the condition that the appellant shall remain physically present before the learned trial Court on each and every date till the conclusion of the trial unless prevented by sufficient cause. 10. Accordingly, this appeal is allowed. 11. Pending, I.A., if any, is disposed of. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Dated: 06.02.2026 Simran/- Uploaded on:-17.02.2026