IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 87 of 2026 Date of Decision: 21st May, 2026 Sapna Thakur ....Petitioner Versus Dr. Vinod Kumar ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner For the respondent : : Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate. Ms. Anuja Mehta Advocate and Ms. Aafreen Kaushal, Advocate, Romesh Verma,Judge (oral) After arguing for some time, Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, at this stage. 2. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed off. (Romesh Verma) May, 21, 2026 Judge (Veena) ____________ Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 entitled for the said benefit of revised pay/grade pay and his pension be also revised accordingly and arrears be ordered to be paid with interest.” 3