Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8955 (CAL)

TIPU SULTAN v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/448/2026 · 2026-03-05

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

05.03.2026 Court No.28 Item No.34 ssi CRM (A) 448 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Suraksha Nagarik Sanhita in connection with Kaliachak Police Station Case No. 947 of 2025 dated 05.06.2025 under Sections 3 /4 of the Explosive Substance Act. And In the matter of: Tipu Sultan. …. Petitioner Mr. Abhishek Chakraborty Mr. Musharaf Alam Sheikh Mr. Sarfaraz Nawaj …for the petitioner Mr. Sanjay Banerjee Mrs. Rituparna Saha …for the State Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is only the co-owner of the property in question. He was not present at the time of bomb blast. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He relies on the seizure list and the statements of the local witnesses. Considering the above and the other incriminating materials available in the case diary, I do not consider this is to be a fit case for granting anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. The presence of the I.O. is noted and is dispensed with. (Jay Sengupta, J.)