HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7840/2026 1. Rajendra S/o Shri Gopal Lal, R/o Rampura Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur. 2. Mohan S/o Shri Gopal Lal, R/o Rampura Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur. ----Accused-Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bal Ram Vashisth For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakad, PP Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.) Order 18/06/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS assailing the order dated 20.02.2026 passed by Additional Sessions Judge No.1, Sambar Lake, District-Jaipur, in bail application No.40/2026, whereby the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner has been rejected. 2. Brief facts giving arise to this bail application are that on the basis of complaint filed by the complainant an FIR came to be registered bearing FIR No.25/2026 for the offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 120B of IPC. 3. Subsequently, the Investigation Officer filed a negative Final Report recording that the case to be of a civil nature. Aggrieved by the same, the complainant filed a protest petition before the concerned Court upon which learned Trial Court vide order dated 23.06.2016 took cognizance of offence under Sections 420, 406, (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7840/2026] 467, 468, 120B of IPC and called the present petitioner through arrest warrant. Aggrieved by the same, the present petitioner preferred a revision petition before the learned Court below, which came to be dismissed vide order dated 24.02.2025. 4. Apprehending arrest on account of arrest warrant, the present petitioners filed an anticipatory bail application before the learned Court below which came to be dismissed vide order dated 20.02.2026. 5. Aggrieved by the same, they have preferred the present misc. bail application. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that upon completion of the investigation, the Investigating Agency filed a negative Final Report. He further submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case and that no incriminating material is available on record against them. He also submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents. Learned counsel contends that the trial is likely to take considerable time and that custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not required. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the petitioners undertake to cooperate with the proceedings and shall remain present before the Court as and when required. They are also willing to furnish appropriate bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. Therefore, it is prayed that the present anticipatory bail application be allowed. 8. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the present bail application. (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7840/2026] 9. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 10. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that the FIR was lodged in the year 2006, the Investigating Agency submitted a negative Final Report, and cognizance was taken in the year 2016, coupled with the fact that the offences alleged are triable by a Magistrate and do not involve any heinous offence, this Court is of the view that the petitioners could have been summoned through a bailable warrant. However, since the petitioners have been directly summoned through an arrest warrant, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the petitioner to appear before the Trial Court on or before 30.06.2026. 11. In the event the petitioners appear before the learned Trial Court on or before 30.06.2026, the learned Trial Court shall accept his personal bond and sureties, as may be considered necessary, to secure his presence on each and every date of hearing and on furnishing of the said personal bonds and sureties, the petitioners shall not be arrested. The bail application stands disposed of. 12. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.)),J ANMOL/152