Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8953 (KAR)

SHRI DUSHYANTHAKUMAR @ RAJESH H B v. SMT ARUNA VEERESH MATTIMANU @ LAKSHMI

MFA/8281/2025 · 2026-02-13

Jayant Banerji, T M Nadaf

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 8281 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SHRI.DUSHYANTHAKUMAR @ RAJESH H.B., S/O BASAVARAJ, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT 72, MATRU LAYOUT, 1ST MAIN ROAD, 2ND CROSS ROAD, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BENGALURU. ...Appellant (By SRIYUTHS:S.V.MANJUNATHA M.N. and NINGARAJU, Advocates) AND: SMT.ARUNA VEERESH MATTIMANU @ LAKSHMI W/O RAJESH H.B., AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOMEMAKER, R/AT 244, B2, BACK, KENDRIYA VIHAR APARTMENT, YELAHANKA OLD TOWN, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU. MFA.No.8281/2025 -------------------------- 2 ALSO R/AT C/O VEERESH MATTIMANU, GUDAVI VILLGE, SORABA TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. …Respondent This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/S 28 of Hindu Marriage Act, against the Judgment and Decree dated 16.08.2025 passed in MC No.35/2022 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Soraba. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following: [ ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the appellant is permitted two weeks and no more time to remove the office objection/s, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed without any further reference to this Court. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Court Order dt.13.02.2026 not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : MK R By : NR C By : STE