Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8951 (KAR)

SRI K NAGARAJU v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/30596/2024 · 2026-03-11

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14579 WP No. 30596 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 30596 OF 2024 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. K. NAGARAJU S/O KAGGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, 2. SMT. SAVITHRAMMA W/O LAKSHMANA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 3. SRI. LAKSHMANA, S/O HANUMANTHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, 4. SRI. DEVARAJU A.L, S/O LAKSHMANAGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 5. SRI. SANJEEVAMURTHY, S/O CHOWDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 6. SRI. VASANTH KUMAR, S/O RAMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 7. SRI. MUDALAGIRI GOWDA, S/O HANUMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 8. SRI. SURESH, S/O ERAIAH, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14579 WP No. 30596 of 2024 AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT KADANKANAHALLI, BELLUR HOBLY, KALINGANAHALLI POST, NAGAMANGALA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 448. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. H.K. RAVI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. CHANNAPPA KENCHANNA.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, M S BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, MYSURU REGION, PUBLIC OFFICE BUILDING, NEW SAYYAJI RAO ROAD, MYSURU - 570 004. 3. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, MANDYA, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 401. 4. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, PANDAVAPURA SUB-DIVISION, PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 434. 5. KADANKANAHALLI MILK PRODUCER'S CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, KADANKANAHALLI, BELLUR HOBLY, NAGAMANGALA TALUK, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14579 WP No. 30596 of 2024 MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 432, (REG. BY CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1959) REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT / CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 6. THE ROUTE EXTENSION OFFICER, MANMUL SUB-OFFICE, NAGAMANGALA, NAGAMANGALA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 432, APPOINTED AS SPECIAL OFFICER FOR KADANKANAHALLI MILK PRODUCER'S CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, BELLUR HOBLY, NAGAMANGALA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 432. 7. SRI. LAKSHMANGOWDA S/O THIMMEGOWDA, MAJOR. 8. SRI. A.T. NAGARAJU, S/O LATE TAMMEGOWDA, MAJOR, 9. SRI. VENKATEGOWDA S/O VENKATEGOWDA, MAJOR, 10. SMT. SHANTHAMMA W/O MARIGOWDA, MAJOR, RESPODNENT NOS.7 TO 10 ARE RESIDING AT KADANKANAHALLI VILLAGE, KALINGANAHALLI POST, BELLUR HOBLY, NAGAMANGALA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 432. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1 TO R6; SRI. M.N. MUNIREDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R7; SRI. B. RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR R8 TO R10) - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14579 WP No. 30596 of 2024 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 14.10.2024 IN NO.SaNi40/C- 10/Va.Ma.Sa./CR-12/2023-24 PASSED BY THE RESPONDNET NO.4 AGAINST THE PETITIONER NO.1 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this Writ Petition, the petitioners are assailing the Order dated 14.10.2024 (Annexure-A) passed by the respondent No.4 against the petitioners in the impugned orders at Annexures - A, A1 to A8 series and consequently, sought for directions to the respondent Nos.3 and 4 to allow the petitioners to discharge their duties as Board of Directors of the respondent No.5 - Society. 2. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the parties, the - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14579 WP No. 30596 of 2024 petitioners herein have been disqualified under Section 27(2)(a) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, on 14.10.2024 and the said period has come to a conclusion upon lapse of one (1) year. It is also to be noted from the writ petition that the respondent No.1 - State has appointed the Administrator for managing the day to day affairs of the respondent No.5 - Society. 3. In that view of the matter, since the period has lapsed as in respect of the disqualification order made against the petitioners, I am of the opinion that, no further orders are required to be made insofar as adjudicating on the impugned order at Annexures - A, A1 to A8 series is concerned. However, in view of the efflux of time, the period suffered by the petitioners shall not come in the way of the petitioners as well as no further action has to be taken against the petitioners insofar as the lapsing period is concerned. Since the disqualified period is concluded and for all other purposes, it is open for the petitioners to participate in the affairs of the Society being - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14579 WP No. 30596 of 2024 a member, insofar as the respondent No.5 - Society is concerned. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE KLV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39