MR. SOURAV DAM v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
WP.ST/151/2024 · 2026-03-05
Madhuresh Prasad, Prasenjit Biswas
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8947 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8947 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Ct. No.4 D/L 05.03.2026 (Naba) 08 W.P.S.T. 151 of 2024
Mr. Sourav Dam Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Tapan Kumar Mukherjee, ld. A.G.P., Mr. Somnath Naskar ...for the State Respondents
1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner.
2. State is represented.
3. We find from the records that on earlier occasion nobody was present to represent the petitioner.
4. Apparently, the petitioner has lost interest to proceed with the case.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in default.
6. Connected application, if any, also stands disposed of. (Madhuresh Prasad, J.)
(Prasenjit Biswas, J.)