Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8947 (CAL)

MR. SOURAV DAM v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WP.ST/151/2024 · 2026-03-05

Madhuresh Prasad, Prasenjit Biswas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ct. No.4 D/L 05.03.2026 (Naba) 08 W.P.S.T. 151 of 2024 Mr. Sourav Dam Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Tapan Kumar Mukherjee, ld. A.G.P., Mr. Somnath Naskar ...for the State Respondents 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. 2. State is represented. 3. We find from the records that on earlier occasion nobody was present to represent the petitioner. 4. Apparently, the petitioner has lost interest to proceed with the case. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in default. 6. Connected application, if any, also stands disposed of. (Madhuresh Prasad, J.) (Prasenjit Biswas, J.)