Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8944 (PNJ)

SHAKUNTLA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

RFA/1013/2022 · 2026-03-10

Harkesh Manuja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RFA-101 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Shakuntla State of CORAM: Present: HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and ors. date. 10.03.2026 sanjay 1013-2022 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** RFA Date of Decision: 10.03.2026 Shakuntla Versus State of Haryana and ors. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate for the appellant/landowner. Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana. Ms. Surbhi Rana, Advocate for Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate for respondents No.3 and 4-HSIIDC. -.- HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) For orders, see RFA-1010 Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and ors. 10.03.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether Reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA-1013-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.03.2026 …….Appellant Versus ..….Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate for the appellant/landowner. Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana. Ms. Surbhi Rana, Advocate for Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate for HSIIDC. 1010-2022, titled as Surender Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and ors., decided vide order of even (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Yes/No 2022, titled as Surender , decided vide order of even (HARKESH MANUJA) SANJAY GUPTA 2026.03.13 17:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document