Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
RFA-101 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Shakuntla State of
CORAM:
Present:
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and ors. date.
10.03.2026 sanjay
1013-2022 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
***** RFA
Date of Decision: 10.03.2026 Shakuntla
Versus State of Haryana and ors.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate for the appellant/landowner.
Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana.
Ms. Surbhi Rana, Advocate for Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate for respondents No.3 and 4-HSIIDC.
-.- HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) For orders, see RFA-1010 Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and ors.
10.03.2026
Whether speaking/reasoned?
Whether Reportable?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA-1013-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.03.2026
…….Appellant Versus
..….Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate for the appellant/landowner. Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana. Ms. Surbhi Rana, Advocate for Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate for HSIIDC. 1010-2022, titled as Surender Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and ors., decided vide order of even
(HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No
Yes/No
2022, titled as Surender , decided vide order of even (HARKESH MANUJA) SANJAY GUPTA 2026.03.13 17:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document