Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8943 (UTT)

ISLAMUDDIN ANSARI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/2246/2026 · 2026-07-27

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010130202026 2026:UHC:6438 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2246/2026 Islamuddin Ansari --Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others --Respondents Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. C.K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Yogesh Pandey, Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Mr. T.A. Khan, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mohd. Shafy, Advocate for respondent no. 2 & 3. 4. According to petitioner, he has been appointed as Chairman of a committee of Mutawalli, which is managing the various waqf properties. In this writ petition, he has alleged that various waqf properties in District Dehradun have been illegally transferred. By means of this writ petition, he has sought the following relief:- “i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to constitute a committee consisting of revenue officials, Nagar Nigam Dehradun, officials of the Waqf Board and further be pleased to direct them to initiate an independent inquiry into the sale and purchase of Waqf property pertaining to Waqf No.4,5, 166, 201, 247, 248, 251, 256, 281 and submit the periodical inquiry reports of the committee before this Hon'ble Court and further be pleased to direct the S.S.P. Dehradun to lodge the First UKHC010130202026 2026:UHC:6438 Information Report and to take legal action against the culprits involved in the sale and purchase of Waqf property.” 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for a while confines his prayer and submits that petitioner has made a representation to Secretary, Department of Minority Welfare, who may be directed to take decision thereupon. The representation is on record as Annexure-9 to the writ petition and the same was allegedly made on 17.06.2026. 6. Having regard to the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned Secretary to take decision on the representation, after hearing all persons who are likely to be affected and also the Uttarakhand Waqf Board, within six months from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 27.07.2026 Navin NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a131bb4 e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56D653D0 95C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2026.07.27 18:19:57 +05'30'