Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8938 (RAJ)

MURALI S/O HANUMAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6508/2026 · 2026-06-12

Bipin Gupta V J

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:23154] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6508/2026 Murali S/o Hanuman, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bandha, P.s. Soorwal, District Sawai Madhopur ( Confined In Sawai Madhopur Jail) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemant Kankoriya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, AGA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.) Order 12/06/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 20.04.2026 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act, Sawai Madhopur, in Bail Application No. 117/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No. 70/2026 registered at Police Station Surwal, District Sawai Madhopur, for the offences under Section 318(4), 319(2), 112(2) and 61(2)(a) of the BNS,2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only three complaints have been registered against the petitioner on the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal and that the amount involved is Rs. 61,000/-. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are no previous criminal antecedents. [2026:RJ-JP:23154] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6508/2026] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the challan has already been filed and trial will take considerable long time and even the offences are triable by a Magistrate, therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail as the accused is in custody since 09.04.2026. 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate vehemently opposes the bail application. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the material available on record. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced that the charge- sheet has been filed and the fact that the offences are triable by Magistrate and the amount involved is Rs.61,000/- only, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted. 7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the petitioner namely - Murali S/o Hanuman arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 70/2026, registered at Police Station Surwal, District Sawai Madhopur, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rupees One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs.50,000/ (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions: [2026:RJ-JP:23154] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6508/2026] (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; (iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and (iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other cyber fraud case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned Trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein. (BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.)),J 39/JUBIN