KIRANJIT KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/4734/2026 · 2026-04-24
Surya Partap Singh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8933 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8933 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-4734
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 115
KIRANJIT KAUR
STATE OF
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present:
SURYA PARTA
directions to the respondents No.
2.
the petitione P-3) before the respondent No. stipulated time.
3.
4734-2026 (O&M) 8587
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH
KIRANJIT KAUR & ANR.
VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA
Mr. Lovepreet Singh, Advocate for
Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL)
The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner directions to the respondents No.2 to 4 to the respondents No.6 to 10. The learned counsel representing the petitioner the petitioners have filed the representation ) before the respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for directions to respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within stipulated time. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-4734-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 24.04.2026
.....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH , Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana, as been filed by the petitioners to protect their life and liberty from sel representing the petitioners submits that representation dated 19.04.2026 (Annexure earned counsel prays for directions to to decide the abovementioned representation within to respondents No.1 to 3. (O&M) 2026
.....PETITIONERS .....RESPONDENTS for from submits that (Annexure earned counsel prays for directions to to decide the abovementioned representation within the GAURAV THAKUR 2026.04.24 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-4734
State is hereby dispensed with. 5. hereby disposed of with a direction to the representation of the petitioner within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is further directed that the petitioners shall be provided requisite security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of their relationship. The police authority of concerned District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to them. Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 4734-2026 (O&M) 8587
Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG is hereby dispensed with. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the representation of the petitioners (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is further directed that the petitioners shall be provided requisite security to protect their life and liberty, if required.
It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of their relationship. The police y of concerned District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to them. Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2
Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana Hence service of notice upon the Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the (Annexure P-3) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is further directed that the petitioners shall be provided requisite safety and security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of their relationship. The police y of concerned District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to them. :Yes/No : Yes/No
upon the Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is respondent No.2 to decide the ) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It safety and security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of their relationship.
The police y of concerned District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on GAURAV THAKUR 2026.04.24 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document