JAGDISH S/O SHRI MOHAN LAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
/5626/2026 · 2026-06-29
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8932 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8932 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:23663] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5626/2026
1. Jagdish S/o Shri Mohan Lal, R/o Barod, Police Station Budhadeet, District Kota -Rural, Rajasthan. (Presently Languishing In Central Jail, Kota).
2. Ajay @ Kuldeep S/o Shri Jagdish, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Barod, Police Station Budhadeet, District Kota -Rural, Rajasthan. (Presently Languishing In Central Jail, Kota).
3. Ramprasad S/o Shri Mohan Lal, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Barod, Police Station Budhadeet, District Kota -Rural, Rajasthan. (Presently Languishing In Central Jail, Kota).
4. Ravi @ Vijay S/o Shri Jagdish, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Barod, Police Station Budhadeet, District Kota -Rural, Rajasthan. (Presently Languishing In Central Jail, Kota). ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Kishan Yogi Mr. Yenu Satyan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 29/06/2026
1. The petitioners has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.13/2026 registered at Police Station Budhadeet, District Kota Rural for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 352 and 189(2) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
[2026:RJ-JP:23663] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5626/2026]
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that in the present incident, an FIR was registered by the petitioner's side against the complainant which was prior in time to the FIR lodged by the complainant. The prosecution has alleged that the present petitioners caused injuries to the complainants Behru Lal, Ranjeet and Ramu Mehra. However, it is evident from the medical reports that the injuries sustained by Behru Lal and Ramu Mehra were not dangerous to life and were simple in nature. It is further contended that the injuries No.1 and 3 sustained by Ranjeet have been opined to be simple in nature, whereas injury No. 2 has been declared grievous. The medical report further states that injury Nos. 1 and 2 could have become dangerous to life only "if they had not been treated in time". It is apparent from the charge-sheet itself that the injured Ranjeet received timely and proper medical treatment. It is further submitted that the Investigating Officer in connivance with the Medical Officer has falsely and deliberately manipulated the medical evidence with the sole intention of implicating the present petitioners in a non-bailable offence. Petitioners are behind the bars since 12.03.2026 without any criminal past. Charge-sheet has already been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, consequently the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. [2026:RJ-JP:23663] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5626/2026]
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6.
Consequently, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Jagdish S/o Shri Mohan Lal, Ajay @ Kuldeep S/o Shri Jagdish, Ramprasad S/o Shri Mohan Lal and Ravi @ Vijay S/o Shri Jagdish, be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that each of them shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/39