M/S PUNNAMI PROPERTIES v. THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER
WP/4834/2022 · 2026-03-24
Lalitha Kanneganti
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8932 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8932 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16587 WP No. 4834 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 4834 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
M/S. PUNNAMI PROPERTIES REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER J.KONDAPA NAIDU FLAT NO.005, PUNNAMI BLISS APARTMENT, CHROMA ROAD, OFF :MARATAHALI OUTER RING ROAD, SY NO.95/2, PANATHUR VILLAGE, BANGALORE - 560 087. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B NAGARAJAN.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
1.
THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER
Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16587 WP No. 4834 of 2022
KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY 2ND FLOOR, SILVER JUBILEE BLOCK, CSI BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 027.
2.
MR.ALTHI RAJESWARA RAO, FLAT NO.206, PUNNAMI BLISS ANNEX, CROMA ROAD, MUNIREDDY LAYOUT, OPP. JP MORGAN, KADUBEESANAHALLI , PANATHUR, BENGALURU-560 103. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C ULLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R1)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R1 TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONERS APPLICATION ON I.A.NO.1/2021
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16587 WP No. 4834 of 2022
DT 17.11.2021 AT ANNEXURE-B ON THE FILE OF THE R1, FILED U/S 8 OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT,
1996.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL ORDER
The writ petition is of the year 2022. The matter has come up on 11.03.2022 and
10.01.2025. When it came up before this Court on 23.03.2026, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for dismissal on 24.03.2026. Today also there is no representation in the morning and the matter is passed over and the matter is taken up at 01.00 p.m. Even at that time also, there is no representation. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16587 WP No. 4834 of 2022
matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
PKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3