[2026:RJ-JP:23530] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17172/2025 Rahul Meena Son of Shri Chiranjeelal Meena, Aged About 19 Years, Resident of Banota, Sawai Madhopur, District Sawai Madhopur ( Rajasthan) Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2976/2026 1. Vikas Alias Vikky S/o Girraj, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Near Mahadev Mandir, Ward No. 02, Uniyara, Police Station Uniyara, District Tonk at Present Tenant House No. 37A, Shyam Nagar, Near Ghar Aangan Society Hajyawala, Police Station Muhana, Jaipur (South) (At present confined in Central Jail, Jaipur). 2. Lokesh S/o Ramswaroop, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Village Banotha, Police Station Soorwal, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) (At present confined in Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2977/2026 Muskan Alias Soniya D/o Vajid, Aged About 22 Years, R/o House No. 1075/05, Indra Colony, Sector Sector-17, Panchkula Hariyana At present Tenant House No. 37A, Near Shyam Vihar Ghar Aangan, Hajyawala, Police Station Muhana, Jaipur (South) (At present confined in Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State pf Rajasthan, Through PP [2026:RJ-JP:23530] (2 of 5) [CRLMB-17172/2025] ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7758/2026 Sajid S/o Ramjani, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Sawai Madhopur Road Maliyon Ka Mandir Ward No. 18, Uniara, Police Station Uniara, District Tonk. Presently Tenant At Behind Sanganer Railway Station Devnagar, Police Station Muhana, Jaipur South. (Presently confined in Central Jail at Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Fateh Ram Meena Mr. Girish Khandelwal Mr. Megharaj Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP Mr. Rajaram Choudhary Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP Mr. Devisahay, Sub Inspector, P.S. Muhana, Jaipur HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.) Order 1. Date of conclusion of Arguments 23.06.2026 2. Date on which the order was reserved 23.06.2026 3. Whether the full order or only operative part is pronounced Full 4. Date of pronouncement 25.06.2026 1. The accused petitioners have approached this Court by filing the instant bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. 2023 arrested by the police in connection with the FIR bearing No.1157/2025 dated 22.11.2025 registered at Police Station Muhana, District Jaipur City (South), for the offences punishable [2026:RJ-JP:23530] (3 of 5) [CRLMB-17172/2025] under Section 115(2), 126(2), 127(2), 140(2), 308(5), 307 and 61(2) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners while arguing the case independently submitted that as the complete case registered by the police at the instance of the complainant is false and baseless as some of the petitioners herein had some financial dispute in regard to monetary transaction and as a consequence of the same, the impugned FIR has been lodged by levelling the false and baseless allegation. 3. Counsel further submitted that the petitioners have kidnapped the complainant not have they taken any amount as alleged. It is further submitted that whatever amount was received, was only in respect of their previous financial transaction and dispute between the parties. Counsel further submitted that the complainant, who is 45 years old man, was trying to develop relationship with a girl aged about 22 years, one of the accused herein and therefore his conduct is serious. 4. Lastly, learned counsel submits that the police, after conducting the investigation, had filed the charge-sheet and therefore there is no purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners behind the bars as no further interrogation and recovery is required, therefore, it is prayed that the petitioners may be enlarged on bail by this Court. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor along with the learned counsel for the complainant strongly opposed the bail applications, submitting that the conduct of the petitioners herein is very serious in nature. They submitted that the complainant was kidnapped by the petitioners who under threat to his life. They got [2026:RJ-JP:23530] (4 of 5) [CRLMB-17172/2025] a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- transferred through digital mode by using a UPI ID. Further they forced the complainant to withdraw additional amounts from various ATMs on the same day. After severely assaulting the complainant, he was thrown at the place mentioned in the FIR in a critical condition. 6. In view of the above, learned counsel submits that the present petitioners do not deserve to be enlarged on bail, considering the gravity and their serious conduct. 7. This Court considered the fact that the petitioners are aged between 19 to 22 years however while considering their age, this Court has also examined the nature and gravity of the allegations as reported in the FIR. It has been alleged the petitioners kidnapped the complainant, took him to various places during which they severely assaulted him as reflected from the photographs available in the case diary. 8. This Court further noted that an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- has transferred by complainant in the name of one Dilkhush Meena, who is close known person of one of the accused, Rahul Meena, however the Police has not yet been able to arrest the person Dilkhush Meena and another accused despite the lapse of more than 6 – 7 months. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the present case, this Court is of the prima facie opinion that the petitioners have formed some kind of illegal group. The Court further observed the Jaipur, being an International city, cannot permit such kind of crime, to be committed by the young individuals forming such groups. The conduct of the petitioners cannot be taken lightly. In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. [2026:RJ-JP:23530] (5 of 5) [CRLMB-17172/2025] 9. Consequently, the bail applications are hereby dismissed. (RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.)),J 169-172(s)/PRATEEK KUMAR