1 ( 2026:HHC:19331 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 411 of 2026 Decided on: 22.05.2026 ________________________________________________ Surjit Kumar & Ors. ....Petitioners Versus Devesh Kumar & Ors. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Ms. Nandita, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated nil, alongwith copy of Office Order dated 03.11.2025, wherein, it has been stated that in compliance to the directions passed by this Court, representations of the petitioners have been considered and decided vide Office Order dated 03.11.2025. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:19331 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the matter is closed. 3. However, if the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to avail appropriate remedy, as available to them under the law. 4. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 22nd May, 2026 Judge (raman)