Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8929 (GAU)

SUBAL CHANDRA DHAR AND 2 ORS v. AUTHUM INVESTMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED AND 5 ORS.

CRP(IO)/281/2026 · 2026-06-24

Mridul Kumar Kalita

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010129792026 2026:GAU-AS:9266 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP(IO)/281/2026 SUBAL CHANDRA DHAR AND 2 ORS SON OF LATE SUDHENDU DHAR, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- WARD NO. 3, NEAR SANI MANDIR, P.O. AND P.S.- JAGIROAD, MORIGAON, ASSAM 2: MRS RADHA RANI DHAR WIFE OF SUBAL CHANDRA DHAR PERMANENT RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- WARD NO. 3 NEAR SANI MANDIR P.O. AND P.S.- JAGIROAD MORIGAON ASSAM 3: MRS PARTIBHA DHAR WIFE OF SAHABUDDIN AHMED PERMANENT RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- WARD NO. 3 NEAR SANI MANDIR P.O. AND P.S.- JAGIROAD MORIGAON ASSA VERSUS AUTHUM INVESTMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED AND 5 ORS. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 707, REHEJA CENTRE, FREE PRESS JOURNAL MARG, NARIMAN POINT, MAHARASTRA- 400021 2:SAHAB UDDIN AHMED SON OF MD. SALEHUDDIN AHMED RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KAHIKUCHI MOUZA- DIMORIA P.O.- TAPATOLI KHETRI KAMRUP (METRO) Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM 3:RELIANCE COMMERCIAL FINANCE LIMITED A PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY DULY REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF COMPANIES ACT 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE SITUATED AT RELIANCE COMMERCIAL FINANCE LIMITED CENTRE 6TH FLOOR SOUTH WING OFF EASTERN HIGHWAY SANTA CRUZ (EAST) MUMBAI- 400055 4:REGIONAL HEAD RELIANCE COMMERCIAL FINANCE LIMITED HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT RELIANCE COMMERCIAL FINANCE LIMITED AIR CONDITION ROAD MARKET 6TH FLOOR 1 SHAKESPARE SARANI KOLKATA- 71 5:HIROK JYOTI LAHKAR BRANCH HEAD RELIANCE COMMERCIAL FINANCE LIMITED RELIANCE CAPITAL LIMITED NEAR K.F.C. OPPOSITE HANUMAN MANDIR G.S. ROAD ULUBARI GUWAHATI- 781007 6:KAUSHIK ROY FIELD EXECUTIVE RELIANCE COMMERCIAL FINANCE LIMITED AIR CONDITION ROAD MARKET 6TH FLOOR 1 SHAKESPARE SARANI KOLKATA- 7 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. R DEKA, MR R M DAS Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA O R D E R 25.06.2026 Heard Mr. R.M. Das, learned counsel for the petitioners, who submits that the petitioners may be allowed to withdraw this Civil Revision Petition (I/O) with leave to file an appropriate application before the appropriate forum. The prayer is allowed. This CRP(I/O) is dismissed on withdrawal with the leave sought for granted. JUDGE Comparing Assistant