Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8928 (KAR)

GOPALAKRISHNA ALVA v. MR. HAMEED

RSA/2130/2017 · 2026-02-21

Ashok S Kinagi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10916 RSA No. 2130 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2130 OF 2017 (RES) BETWEEN: 1. GOPALAKRISHNA ALVA S/O LATE DOOMANNA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 2. SMT. PADMAVATHI D/O LATE DOOMANNA AGED 65 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT ADYAR GRAMA, ADYAR VILLAGE AND POST MANGALORE TALUK D.K.DISTRICT PIN-575007 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. RAVISHANKAR SHASTRY G., ADV.) AND: 1. MR. HAMEED S/O ANHABA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10916 RSA No. 2130 of 2017 2. AFSATH D/O HAMEED AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 3. JAMEER S/O HAMEED AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 4. SHAJEEDA D/O HAMEED AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 5. MUSTAFA S/O HAMEED AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R1 TO R6 ARE RESIDING AT ADYAR GRAMA ADYAR VILLAGE, MANGALURU TALUK D.K.DISTRICT, PIN-575007 …RESPONDENTS (R4 AND R5 ARE SERVED) THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 20.07.2017 PASSED IN R.A.NO. 156/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE, MANGALURU.D.K., ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND FILED AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 29.08.2013 PASSED IN OS.NO.607/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., MANGALORE D.K. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10916 RSA No. 2130 of 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants filed a memo for withdrawal of the appeal stating that the dispute between the parties is amicably settled by executing a registered sale deed 05.11.2025. Hence, the appellants are not interested in further prosecuting the appeal and copy of the affidavit is enclosed along with memo. 2. The memo along with affidavit is taken on record. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SSB