Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8925 (CHH)

M/S RAMNIWAS MINING PRIVATE LIMITED v. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

WPC/1036/2026 · 2026-03-16

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:12802 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1036 of 2026 M/s Ramniwas Mining Private Limited Through- Its Director Mr. Chandan Agrawal S/o Late Ramniwas Agrawal Aged About 39 Years R/o House No4, Infront Of Axis Bank Kuchery Road, Rourkela Sundargarh Odisha ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Punjab National Bank Branch Office Ambikapur Kharsia Road District- Surguja (C.G.) 2 - Punjab National Bank Circle Office Bilaspur Ring Road No.2, Gaurav Path, Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Collector Cum District Magistrate Ambikapur District- Surguja Chhattusgarh 4 - The Sub Divisional Magistrate Ambikapur District- Surguja (C.G.) 5 - Tehsildar Ambikapur District- Surguja (C.G.) 6 - Superintendent Of Police Ambikapur District- Surguja (C.G.) 7 - Shri Dhanajay Pandey S/o Shri Harishankar Pandey R/o Near Shree Ram Hospital Ward No.32 Sheetla Ward Surguja (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Adv. For Respondents No. 1 and 2 : Mr. Sharad Mishra, Adv. AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Digitally signed by AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Date: 2026.03.19 11:30:36 +0530 2 For respondents No. 3 to 6 : Mr. Saumitra Kesharwani, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order On Board 17-3-2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner has purchased Plot No. 3367/4857/1 area 0.08 acre situated at Sattipara, beside Sri Ram Hospital, Ambikapur in auction, despite that, possession has not been handed over to it by respondents No. 1 and 2. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents No. 1 and 2 would submit that, they will take appropriate step with regard to handing over the subject land to the petitioner. 3. In view of above submission, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file afresh, if cause of action arises. 4. Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with the liberty to the petitioner as sought for. 5. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge pathak