Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8924 (AP)

Vattikuti Janaki Ramayya v. Meka Anantha Lakshmi Parvathi

CRP/4970/2017 · 2026-09-02

A Hari Haranadha Sarma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010299652017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3520] THURSDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4970/2017 Between: 1. VATTIKUTI JANAKI RAMAYYA, S/O. LATE VENKAT RAYUDU OCC: CULTIVATION R/O. MURAMANDA VILLAGE, KADIAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. MEKA ANANTHA LAKSHMI PARVATHI, W/o. Late Janaki Ramayya @ Bhushanam Cultivation R/o. Muramanda Village, Kadiam Mandal, East Godavari District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toagainst the Order passed in IA No. 903/2017 in OS No. 324/2010 dt: 11-9-2017 on the file of the Court of the I Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Rajamahendravaram, Rast Godavari District at Kakinada. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 6459 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedigns in OS No. 324/2010 on the file of the Court of the I Addl. Senior Civil Judge, rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District at Kakinada in the interest of Justice and to pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4970 OF 2017 ORDER: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present Civil Revision Petition, without prejudice to the rights of the Civil Revision Petitioner / defendant in the suit to raise all objections in respect of the Will relied on by the plaintiff. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA, J Date:03.09.2026 Knr 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA C.R.P.No.4970 of 2017 03.09.2026 Knr