Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8923 (GAU)

FURKANUL ISLAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./772/2026 · 2026-06-23

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010054702026 2026:GAU-AS:9144 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./772/2026 FURKANUL ISLAM SON OF HAJARAT ALI @ HAJRAT ALI RESIDENT OF VILL- BARPETA,P.S. RUPAHIHAT, DIST.NAGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A CHAUDHURY, MR. D BORA,MR. N MAHAJAN,MR. P K DAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 24.06.2026 1. Heard Mr. N. Mahajan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. Baishya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. This application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, seeking bail of the petitioner, namely, Furkanul Islam, who was arrested on 17.02.2026 in connection with Rupahihat P.S. Case No. 420/2025 under Sections 123 of BNS, R/W Section 22 (c)/25/8(c) of NDPS Act. 3. The scanned copy of the TCR as called for has been received. 4. Upon perusal of the case diary, no material other than the statement of the co-accused has been noticed. 5. In view of the above, and for the reasons assigned in the order dated 07.05.2026 passed in this case, the prayer for bail is allowed. The order of interim bail dated 07.05.2026 is hereby made absolute, on the same terms and conditions. 6. It is further directed that the petitioner shall appear before the learned Trial Court regularly during the trial, if one commences. 7. Accordingly, the bail petition is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant