Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010121782026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3189/2026 LAISHRAM RAMANANDA SINGH AND 3 ORS S/O L. NABACHANDRA SINGH R/O GUWAHATI TRAFFIC COLONY, KAMRUP (M), GUWAHATI. P.O. AND P.S. PAN BAZAAR DIST.- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM PIN- 781001 2: MANORANJAN DAS S/O- HARESWAR DAS R/O-VILLAGE KANOIBARI P/O-BHETHUA P/S-DATHASARKUCHI PIN- 781325 3: ASIFUR RAHMAN S/O- UMAR ALI R/O-GARIGOAN P/S-JALUKBARI P.O.-GARIGOAN POST OFFICE PIN-781012 4: JAGAT CHANDRA BARMAN S/O-LT. RAJKUMAR BARMAN AGE- 51 YEARS R/O-VILLAGE TUPAMARI P.S-KOTWALI DISTRICT-COOCH BEHAR PIN-73613 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, RAIL BHAVAN RAISINA ROAD, NEW DELHI, PIN-110001 2:THE DIG (ESTABLISHMENT) RAILWAY BOARD RAIL BHAVAN RAISINA ROAD NEW DELHI PIN-110001 3:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE RAIL BHAVAN RAISINA ROAD Page No.# 2/4 NEW DELHI PIN-110001 4:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF SECURITY COMMISSIONER NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI-781011 ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR I RAFIQUE, MS A AFREEN,CHONBEN Z YANTHAN,N CHAKRABORTY,MRS S A CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 24.06. 2026 Heard Mr. I. Rafique learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. R. K. D. Choudhury, learned D.S.G.I. & Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. L. Devi, learned counsel for the Union of India. 2. The writ petitioners has approached this Court assailing the transfer order issued by the Railway authorities. By order dated 17.06.2026, the learned CGC was permitted to obtain instructions and the transfer order was directed to be not given effect to till today. 3. Today when the matter is called up, Mr. I. Rafique, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has instructions to submit before this Court that the writ petitioners will approach the appropriate authority by filling a detailed representations. It is further submitted that the petitioners will ventilate their Page No.# 3/4 grievances by way of representations and prays that the same be directed to be taken into account by the appropriate authority, namely Respondent No. 4, the Principal Chief Security Commissioner, Northeast Frontier Railway. It is further submitted that, upon such representations being filed, the said respondents be directed to consider and dispose of the representation by taking into account of the grievances made by the petitioners by passing a speaking order. 5. On the prayer made by the petitioners, the learned DSGI does not raise any objection. However, he submits that the representation be filed within a period of 3 days from today and thereafter within a further period of 1 week, the representations will be disposed of by the Respondent No. 4. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition stands disposed of with the following order. 7. The petitioners are permitted to file detailed representations before the Respondent No. 4, namely the Principal Chief Security Commissioner, Northeast Frontier Railway, ventilating their grievances within a period of 3 (three) days from today. Upon receipt of such representations, the representations will be disposed of by the authorities concerned within a period of 7 (seven) days from the date of receipt of the representations being filed by the petitioner by passing a speaking order. 8. Needless to say, any such order that may be passed by the respondent authorities, copies thereof shall be served upon the writ petitioner. Page No.# 4/4 9. Till the representations stands disposed of as directed, the movement orders shall not be given effect to. It is also made clear that in the event, the petitioners fail to file the representations within the time as permitted, then the interim order passed by this Court shall stands vacated without any further reference. 10. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the authorities concerned to consider the prayer of the petitioners as per the relevant guidelines governing the transfer and posting of Railway Protection Force. JUDGE Comparing Assistant