Azhagarsamy v. M/s. Sri Ram City Union Finance Limited
CRP(MD)/444/2026 · 2026-02-18
N Senthilkumar
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 89209 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 89209 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRP(MD). No.444 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 18.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR C.R.P(MD). No.444 of 2026 1.Azhagarsamy 2.Akila ... Petitioners Vs M/s.Shri Ram City Union Finance Limited, D.No.123, Angappa Naicker Street, Chennai. Represented by its Branch Manager, through its branch office at No.52B, 1st Floor, New Road, Upstairs of Union Bank, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondent PRAYER :-Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the docket order, dated 16.12.2025 in unnumbered Arbitration O.P.No.2026 in ACP TF No.290 of 2022 and direct the Principle and Sessions Judge, Thoothukudi, to number the unnumbered Arbitration O.P of 2026 in ACP TF No.290 of 2022 and allow the civil revision petition. For Petitioners : Mr.M.Prabu 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP(MD). No.444 of 2026
ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the docket
order dated 16.12.2025 passed in an unnumbered Arbitration O.P. of 2026 in ACP TF No.290 of 2022, and to direct the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thoothukudi, to number the said unnumbered Arbitration O.P.
2. The trial Court had initially returned the Arbitration O.P. on 24.11.2025 pointing out certain defects relating to limitation and payment of proper Court fee. The petition was thereafter re-presented on
03.12.2025. However, by docket order, dated 16.12.2025, the petition was once again returned on the ground that the earlier defects had not been properly complied with.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. This Court is of the view that without complying with the defects pointed out by the trial Court, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of the present revision, which is not maintainable. The petitioner is bound to comply with the returns and satisfy the 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP(MD). No.444 of 2026 requirements as directed by the trial Court before seeking any further relief.
5. In such circumstances, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present Civil Revision Petition. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to comply with the returns made by the trial Court and re- present the petition before the concerned Court. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed with the above liberty. No costs. Speaking : Yes / No 18.02.2026 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Indu Note : Registry is directed to return the original plaint to the learned counsel for the petitioner, after getting an endorsement. To The Principal District and Sessions Court, Thoothukudi District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP(MD). No.444 of 2026 N.SENTHILKUMAR, J. Indu CRP(MD). No.444 of 2026 18.02.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis