Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 892 (JHR)

RENU SHARMA v. JHARKHAND REAL-ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY, RANCHI

WPC/7514/2025 · 2026-01-09

Rajesh Kumar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:472 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.7514 of 2025 .... Renu Sharma, aged about 40 years, wife of Sri Mahendra Nath Sharma, resident of House No.269, Hawai Nagar, Road No.0, Birsa Chowk, P.O. & P.S. Hatia, District- Ranchi .… Petitioner Versus 1. Jharkhand Real-Estate Regulatory Authority, Ranchi, through its Secretary, Municipal Corporation Building, Ranchi, P.O., G.P.O.-Ranchi, P.S.-Kotwali, District-Ranchi 2. Mahavir Kanshi, son of Bhartu Kanshi 3. Urmila Devi, wife of Mahavir Kanshi 4. Parmand Kanshi 5. Sachidanand Kanshi 6. Shivanand Kanshi Respondent No.4 to 6 are sons of Mahavir Kanshi and respondent No.2 to 6 are residents of House No.88 Road No.2, Birsa Nagar, Birsa Chowk, P.O. & P.S. Jagannathpur, District-Ranchi 7. Vinayak Developers and Associates, partnership firm through one of its partners having its office at ground floor, Yashodanand Apartment, House No.13 Kidwapur, P.O. Kidwaipuri, P.S. Kotwali, District-Patna-80001 8. Sri Praneet son of Chandrabhushan Singh, resident of Saroj Savitri Apartment, Mahesh Nagar Road No.3, P.O. & P.S.-Patna, District-Patna 9. Anuj Kumar, son of Shyamji Sahay, resident of Shanti Niketan, new belly road, P.O. & P.S. Danapur, District-Patna 10. Mahesh Kumar Pansari, son of Sri Krishna Murari Pansari, resident of house no.4, Yugal Kunj, road no.16 Rajeev Nagar, P.O. & P.S. Patna, District-Patna .... Respondents .... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K.Sahani, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Bibhash Sinha, Adv. .... 02/09.01.2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed for following relief:- “For grant of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus or an order or direction commanding upon the Respondents no. 1 to consider and dispose of Complaint case no. 35 of 2025 filed on 27.05.2025 and to pass an appropriate order within a reasonable period.” 2. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to pursue the pending case diligently. 3. Learned counsel for the other side has raised no objection. 4. Permission is accorded. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) 09.01.2026 Shahid/ Uploaded on 12.01.2026