BHUNESH KUMAR JODHTA AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CWP/3307/2026 · 2026-03-20
Ajay Mohan Goel
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 892 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 892 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 3307 of 2026
Decided on: 20.03.2026 Sh. Bhunesh Kumar Jodhta and another
… Petitioners
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others
… Respondents
Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioners : M/s Rahul Thakur and Shekhar
Badola, Advocates.
For the respondents : Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Assistant
Advocate General for respondents-
State.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
As the petitioners have approached the Court directly without firstly approaching the competent Authority, as prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that in the event of the petitioners filing separate representation(s) with regard to the issue raised in the writ petition to the competent Authority within a period of 4 weeks from today, let the same be decided in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks thereafter, in view of the averments made therein as well as judgments, if any, being relied upon by the petitioners, by passing a speaking order. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge March 20, 2026 (narender)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?