P.Thangapandian v. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi
WP Crl.(MD)/759/2026 · 2026-02-11
S Srimathy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 89191 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 89191 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.CRL.(MD)No.759 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.CRL.(MD)No.759 of 2026 P.Thangapandiyan ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by the Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi, Tenkasi District. 2. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Puliyankudi Sub Division, Tenkasi District. 3. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by the Inspector of Police, Sivagiri Police Station, Tenkasi District. 4. A.Ajantha
5. Arunkumar
6. Sathyamoorthy
7. S.Sivasankari
... Respondents 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.CRL.(MD)No.759 of 2026 PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st to 3rd respondents to consider based on the petitioner representation dated 10.12.2025, 11.12.2025 and 19.12.2025 and to take action against the 4th to 7th respondents. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Karansingh
For Respondents : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad Government Advocate (Crl.Side) (R1 to R3)
O R D E R This writ petition is filed for Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 10.12.2025, 11.12.2025 and 19.12.2025 and to take action against the respondents 4 to 7. 2. The allegation against respondents 4 to 7 is that they received money from the petitioner for securing a job in Government. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 have submitted that the respondents 1 to 3 conducted an inquiry, but it was subsequently closed. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.CRL.(MD)No.759 of 2026
4. It is seen from the records there is money transaction but the petitioner has submitted WhatsApp chats in which respondents 4 to 7 allegedly promised to secure the job and appointment order was issued directly to join within 7 days. However, the petitioner was unable to submit the evidence before the respondents 1 to 3. 5. Hence, this Court directs the respondents 1 to 3 to re-investigate the petitioner's complaint and take further action as per the law. Further it is evident that the petitioner paid money with the intention of securing a job, which amounts to bribe, hence action of the petitioner should also be considered. Appropriate action may be initiated against the petitioner as well. 6. With these observations, this Writ Petition (Criminal) is disposed of.
11.02.2026 Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes NCC : Yes / No
3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.CRL.(MD)No.759 of 2026 msrm To
1. The Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi, Tenkasi District. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Puliyankudi Sub Division, Tenkasi District. 3. The Inspector of Police, Sivagiri Police Station, Tenkasi District. 4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.CRL.(MD)No.759 of 2026 S.SRIMATHY, J msrm Order made in W.P.CRL.(MD)No. 759 of 2026 11.02.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis