Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8912 (UTT)

PREETI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/1959/2026 · 2026-07-24

Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010128792026 2026:UHC:6336 1 HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition Service Single No. 1959 of 2026 Preeti --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand and Others --Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Vikas Pande, learned counsel for petitioner. Mr. Maneesh Bisht, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/respondents. Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. (Oral) By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:- (a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing/setting aside the impugned order dated 30-4-2026 passed by respondent no. 3 (Annexure No.1, page No.15-16), whereby the petitioner’s representation dated 8.4.2026 has been rejected/not favourably decided; (b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to complete the selection process and conduct the interview for the post of Lecturer Sanskrit in Janta Inter College, Kunajkhal, Pauri Garhwal pursuant to advertisement No.8/2015-16 dated 6.12.2015, on the basis of the existing merit list dated 9.9.2016, in terms of the pre-amended Uttarakhand School Education Regulations, 2009, within such time-frame as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit to fix; 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner applied for the post of Lecturer (Sanskrit) in the non-government aided institute managed by respondent No.4, pursuant to advertisement dated 06.12.2015. He submits that petitioner claims appointment pursuant to the selection held under the aforesaid advertisement issued in 2015 only on the ground that he was on the top of the select list. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for UKHC010128792026 2026:UHC:6336 2 petitioner that selection process has yet not been completed. 4. It is quite impossible to comprehend that the selection process would continue since 2015 to till date, particularly, when there is a clear provision in Regulation 10 (dd) and Regulation 21 of Chapter-2 of the Uttarakhand School Education Regulations, 2009 (as amended up to date), whereby, it is provided that the selection should be completed within a period of three months from the date of issuance of the advertisement. Regulation 10 (dd) and Regulation 21 of the Regulations are quoted herein below:- “10 (dd) tgk¡ [k.M ¼d½ ds v/khu foKkfir in fdlh b.VjehfM,V laLFkk ds iz/kkukpk;Z ds in ds fy, gks] ogk¡ ,slh laLFkk ds izoDrk Js.kh ds nks T;s’Bre v/;kid vkSj tgk¡ foKkfir in fdlh gkbZLdwy laLFkk ds iz/kkuk/;kid ds in ds fy, gks ogk¡ ,slh laLFkk ds ,y0Vh0 Js.kh ds nks T;s’Bre v/;kid] vkSj tgk¡ foKkfir in fdlh twfu;j gkbZLdwy@izkFkfed fo|ky; ds iz/kkuk/;kid in ds fy, gks] ogk¡ ,slh laLFkk ds T;s’Bre~ lgk;d v/;kid tks ,sls in ds fy, fofgr U;wure vgZrk;sa j[krs gksa vkSj ftUgksaus viuh&viuh Js.kh esa de ls de nl o’kZ dh yxkrkj lsok] ftlds vUrxZr ,slh vof/k ;fn dksbZ gks ftlds nkSjku mUgksaus vLFkk;h :Ik ls iz/kkukpk;Z@iz/kkuk/;kid ds :Ik esa lsok dh gks] Hkh gSS] ml in ds fy, lk{kkRdkj ds fufeÙk cqyk;s tkus ds gdnkj gksaxs Hkys gh os [k.M ¼?k½ ds v/khu izFke lkr LFkkuksa esa u vkrs gksaA ijUrq ekU;rk izkIr fo|ky;ksa esa iz/kkukpk;Z@iz/kkuk/;kid@f”k{kdksa ds p;u ds fy;s inksa dk foKkiu izdkf”kr djus ds rhu ekg ds Hkhrj p;u dh dk;Zokgh iw.kZ dj yh tk,A ;fn p;u dh dk;Zokgh mDrkof/k esa iw.kZ u dh tk lds rks inksa dk iqu% foKkiu fd;k tk;sxkA 21. tgka izcU/k lfefr bl v/;k; esa fn, x, fofu;eksa ds vuqlkj fdlh ,sls Lohd`r in dks tks] fjDr gks x;k gks] ,slh fjfDr gksus ds fnukad ls rhu ekl dh vof/k ds Hkhrj foKkfir ugha djrh gS rks ,slk in vH;fiZr dj fn;k x;k le>k tk;sxk vkSj rc rd ugha Hkjk tk;sxk tc rd fd funs”kd }kjk mldk l`tu fQj ls Lohd`r u dj fn;k tk;sA” 5. In such view of the matter, no interference is warranted. Accordingly, the present writ petition fails and is dismissed in-limine. 6. Pending application stands disposed of. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 24.07.2026 PN PREETI NEGI Digitally signed by PREETI NEGI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=63c75a8c4765581180a58d7478fadbe383 31bac55c78b5f9f0276c16432f6aab, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=2BA53171893B3C3CB3CCCAE81FA E064498483A83D84BDB0F9229D5BF08D959AC, cn=PREETI NEGI Date: 2026.07.27 14:11:59 +05'30'