Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8912 (ALL)

SUBBA RAM v. RADHIKA RANI AND 11 OTHERS

A227/13362/2026 · 2026-09-23

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13362 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed seeking direction upon Civil Judge (Junior Division), City, Varanasi to decide the temporary injunction application 6-C filed in Suit No. 1842 of 2026 within a time frame fixed by this Court. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that 6-C application filed in Civil Suit No. 1842 of 2026 is pending consideration and till date the same has not been decided by the court concerned. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon Civil Judge (Junior Division), City, Varanasi to decide the temporary injunction application (6-C) filed in Suit No. 1842 of 2026, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 24, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudarshan Singh, Vivek Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Subba Ram .....Petitioner(s) Radhika Rani And 11 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad