Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8909 (RAJ)

JITENDRA S/O BABULAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMA/272/2026 · 2026-06-22

Ravi Chirania

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:23489] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 272/2026 In S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8171/2026 Jitendra S/o Babulal, R/o Village Bhutawali Post Bindayaka, Police Station Bindayaka, District Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anurag Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.) Order 22/06/2026 1. This miscellaneous application has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 by the petitioner-Jitendra S/o Babulal, for modification in the order dated 16.06.2026 passed by this Court in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 8171/2026. 2. Petitioner had moved the bail application under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 and the Court granted the relief to the petitioner. Inadvertently, the bail was allowed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023. Learned counsel submits that due to this clerical error, implementation of the order is not possible. He also submits that petitioner has already deposited the penalty amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- by way of a challan. 3. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is hereby allowed. The modification order be read as under:- [2026:RJ-JP:23489] (2 of 3) [CRLMA-272/2026] “1. This instant bail application has been filed by the petitioner Jitendra S/o Babulal, apprehending his arrest by the police in connection with the FIR No.65/2026 dated 17.04.2026 registered at Police Station Datwas, District Tonk for the offences punishable under Sections 223(a) and 305(e) of the BNS, 2023 and Sections 4 and 21 of the MMDR Act, 1957. 2. Learned counsel submits that petitioner has already deposited the penalty amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- and Rs. 11,000/- by way of a challan. He further submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents of similar nature. In view thereof, learned counsel prays that the petitioner be granted the benefit of anticipatory bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application. 4. Considering the fact that the penal amount has already been deposited and noting the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court, without making any comments on the merits of the case, is inclined to exercise its power under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 and deems it just and proper to grant the benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused- petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the instant bail application filed under Section 482 BNSS is hereby allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of accused- [2026:RJ-JP:23489] (3 of 3) [CRLMA-272/2026] petitioner Jitendra S/o Babulal, he shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of concerned I.O./ S.H.O on the following conditions:- (i) he shall make himself available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required and co- operate in the investigation; (ii) he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii) he shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. 6. The petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty granted by this Court. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case.” 4. This order shall remain part of the order dated 16.06.2026. (RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.)),J 139/SHRUTI SHARMA