Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8907 (ALL)

RAKESH KUMAR AGRAHARI v. PISHOO @ SONU AND 5 OTHERS

A227/13217/2026 · 2026-09-22

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13217 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This is defendant's petition. 2. The suit filed by plaintiffs-respondents was dismissed for want of prosecution on 13.08.2015 wherein the defendant had appeared and an application under Order IX Rule 9 CPC was filed, which is pending consideration. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the same. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the restoration application registered as Case No. 310 of 2022 arising out of Suit No. 869 of 2011, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 23, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Rajak Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Rakesh Kumar Agrahari .....Petitioner(s) Pishoo @ Sonu And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad