Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8906 (PNJ)

SFANA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/3490/2026 · 2026-03-30

Surya Partap Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-3490 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 114 SFANA & ANR. STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PARTA directions to the respondents No.4 2. petitioner before the respondent No. stipulated time. 3. 3490-2026 (O&M) 8587 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH & ANR. VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA Mr. Vishal Thakur, Advocate for Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, DAG Punjab PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner directions to the respondents No.1 to 3 to the respondents No.4 and 5. The learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the rs have filed the representation the respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for directions to respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-3490-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 30.03.2026 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH , Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, DAG Punjab. as been filed by the petitioners to protect their life and liberty from sel representing the petitioner submits that the dated 23.03.2026 (Annexure P earned counsel prays for directions to to decide the abovementioned representation within a to respondents No.1 to 3. (O&M) 2026 .....PETITIONERS .....RESPONDENTS for from sel representing the petitioner submits that the (Annexure P-5) earned counsel prays for directions to the to decide the abovementioned representation within a GAURAV THAKUR 2026.04.01 09:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-3490 hereby dispensed with. 5. hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 representation of the petitioner within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is further directed that the petitioners shall be provided requisite safety and security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of their relationship. The police authority of concerned D assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to them. Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 3490-2026 (O&M) 8587 Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, DAG Punjab Hence service of notice hereby dispensed with. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 representation of the petitioners (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is further directed that the petitioners shall be provided requisite safety and rity to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of their relationship. The police authority of concerned District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to them. Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2 Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, DAG Punjab Hence service of notice upon the State Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the (Annexure P-5) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is further directed that the petitioners shall be provided requisite safety and rity to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of their relationship. The police istrict shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to them. :Yes/No : Yes/No upon the State is Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is to decide the ) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is further directed that the petitioners shall be provided requisite safety and rity to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of their relationship. The police istrict shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on GAURAV THAKUR 2026.04.01 09:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document