Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8904 (GAU)

RADHESHYAM THAKUR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Crl.)/645/2026 · 2026-06-24

Michael Zothankhuma, Rajesh Mazumdar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010129582026 2026:GAU-AS:9250-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/645/2026 RADHESHYAM THAKUR S/O- MAHADEV THAKUR, R/O- VILLAGE- SANKARPUR BALIGAON, P.S- GOGAMUKH, DIST- DHEMAJI, ASSAM-784110 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : P BORUAH, MR D TAYE,MR D K MEDHI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0 RADHESHYAM THAKUR S/O- MAHADEV THAKUR R/O- VILLAGE- SANKARPUR BALIGAON P.S- GOGAMUKH DIST- DHEMAJI ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Page No.# 2/2 ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : Pratima Boruah Advocate for : appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 25-06-2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Mr. D.K. Medhi, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that there is a delay of 131 days in filing the appeal against conviction of the applicant under Section 302 IPC. Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned Sr. Counsel and Addl. P.P submits that she has got no objection to the delay being condoned. Accordingly, the delay of 131 days is condoned. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same. I.A. is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant