HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9187 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Learned counsel for the applicant and Learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No.826 of 2001, under Sections 147, 325, 353, 504, 224, 225, 307, 323, 506, 332 I.P.C., Police Station Civil Lines, District Moradabad, with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail as the applicant apprehends his arrest in the abovementioned case. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. One person has received injuries but no specific role has been assigned to the applicant. The applicant shall cooperate in the expeditious disposal of the trial and may be considered for grant of anticipatory bail as co-accused Jaiveer Singh and Jagdish @ Sethi have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in NABAIL No.10787 of 2025 and 4332 of 2026. Learned counsel states that the applicant has a criminal history of three cases but is not a previous convict. He has further submitted that the applicant had no knowledge of the issuance of non-bailable warrants and process under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. was issued only in the month of November, 2025. The applicant is an old man aged about 61 years. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail and has contended that Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhishek Kumar Singh, Manoj Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Tejveer .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) the incident is of the year 2001 and the applicant and the other accused have been avoiding appearance before the concerned court. They are absconders and may not be considered for grant of anticipatory bail. 5. I have considered the submissions made by the Learned counsels for the parties. 6. The F.I.R. was lodged on 17.08.2001 against eleven named accused and fifteen to twenty unnamed persons. The applicant was named in the F.I.R. The co-accused Jaiveer Singh, who had a criminal history of twelve cases and against whom also proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. had been issued and Jagdish @ Sethi against whom also proclamation under Section 82 was issued, have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court. 7. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to enlarge applicant on anticipatory bail. 8. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. 9. In the event of the arrest of the applicant-Tejveer, he shall be released forthwith in the aforesaid case crime on anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond and surety to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/Court concerned with the following conditions:- i. the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; ii. that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iii. that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court; iv. that the applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness; NABAIL No. 9187 of 2026 2 10. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the Court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. 11. It is made clear that observations made hereinabove are exclusively for deciding the instant anticipatory bail application and are not to be considered to be an opinion on the merits of the case. September 23, 2026 A. Pandey NABAIL No. 9187 of 2026 3 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad